Friday, October 23, 2009

Physicists Calculate Number of Parallel Universes

In a new study, Stanford physicists Andrei Linde and Vitaly Vanchurin have calculated the number of all possible universes, coming up with an answer of 10^10^16. If that number sounds large, the scientists explain that it would have been even more humongous, except that we observers are limited in our ability to distinguish more universes; otherwise, there could be as many as 10^10^10^7 universes.
To work these numbers out, Linde and Vanchurin looked back to the time shortly after the , which they view as a quantum process that generated lots of quantum fluctuations. Then during the period of inflation, the universe grew rapidly and these quantum fluctuations were "frozen" into classical perturbations in distinct regions. Today, each of these regions could be a different universe, having its own distinct laws of low energy physics.
By analyzing the mechanism (called "slow roll ") that initially generated the , the scientists could estimate the number of resulting universes at 10^10^10^7 (a number which is dependent on the model they used). However, this number is limited by other factors, specifically by the limits of the human brain. Since the total amount of information that one individual can absorb in a lifetime is about 10^16 bits, which is equivalent to 10^10^16 configurations, this means that a human brain couldn't distinguish more than 10^10^16 universes.
Requiring that the human brain must be able to count the number of parallel universes may seem inappropriate, if not arrogant, but Linde and Vanchurin explain that dealing with the quantum world is different than our everyday lives in which quantum effects can be safely ignored. A crucial part of their calculation here is an investigation of quantum effects on supergalactic scales. In this kind of scenario, the state of the multiverse and observations made by an observer are correlated (similar to the Schrodinger cat experiment, where the outcome can be determined only after it is registered by a classical observer).
"When we analyze the probability of the existence of a universe of a given type, we should be talking about a consistent pair: the universe and an observer who makes the rest of the universe 'alive' and the wave function of the rest of the universe time-dependent," the scientists write. As the scientists explain, the calculation of the number of universes is an important step toward an even larger goal: to find the probability of living in a with a particular set of properties. What are the chances that we live in a world in which the laws of physics are these laws that we currently observe? Answering this question requires finding probabilities that depend on knowing about other universes, among many other challenges.

9 comments:

Ric Larson said...

Intellects only need to respond.

Dave said...

See green leafy substance below..

Joanna said...

I don't think that you posted that on your own. Sounds like Desi.

Joanna said...

Yeah,Like realizing our miniscule part in the whole spectrum of things. We are existentialism beings,in that we only see what is real as we see it as it roles through our minds "now",in the present.Quite like a computer. Stores data evey 3-4 seconds.

Joanna said...

No offense Ric,Just my thoughts.

Pat said...

yea, I'm with dave...see leafy substance below.

Ric Larson said...

I dont think you posted that response Jo, sounds like Sam.

Joanna said...

It was me. I do have my very strong thoughts about life in general.Sam would have blasted you another you know what. I,on the other hand, just say what I think.You never posted much of anything without substance yet,I agree that there is a parallel universe possibly and the ones we lost just might be there looking at our lives and saying Hmmmm.

Joanna said...

No leafy things involved...just intellect.